AMD EPYC Embedded 3101 vs Intel Xeon E5 2608L v3
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC Embedded 3101 with 4 cores 2.1GHz and Intel Xeon E5 2608L v3 with 6 cores 2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC Embedded 3101 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Higher specification of memory (2666 vs 1866)
Higher base frequency (2.1GHz vs 2GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (14nm vs 22nm)
Lower TDP (35W vs 52W)
Intel Xeon E5 2608L v3 's Advantages
Larger L3 cache size (15MB vs 8MB)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 5 Single Core
AMD EPYC Embedded 3101
+53%
755
Intel Xeon E5 2608L v3
493
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
AMD EPYC Embedded 3101
+211%
2709
Intel Xeon E5 2608L v3
870
General Parameters
Feb 2018
Release Date
Sep 2014
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Zen
Core Architecture
Haswell-EP
AMD BGA SP4r2
Socket
Intel Socket 2011-3
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC Embedded (Zen (Snowy Owl))
Generation
Xeon E5 (Haswell-EP)
Package
4.8 billions
Transistor Count
2.6 billions
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
22 nm
35 W
Power Consumption
52 W
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
Intel
213 mm²
Die Size
356 mm²
CPU Performance
2.1 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2 GHz
2.9 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
4
Total Core Count
6
4
Total Thread Count
6
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
21.0
Multiplier
20.0
96 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
256 K per core
8 MB shared
L3 Cache
15 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2
Memory Parameters
DDR4-2666
Memory Types
DDR4-1866
2
Max Memory Channels
4
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
3
PCIe Version
3
32
PCIe Lanes
40
