AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 vs Xeon E7520
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 with 8 cores 1.5GHz and Xeon E7520 with 4 cores 1.866GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Higher specification of memory (2133 vs 1333)
Newer PCIe version (3 vs 2)
More modern manufacturing process (14nm vs 45nm)
Lower TDP (30W vs 95W)
Xeon E7520 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (1.866GHz vs 1.5GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (18MB vs 16MB)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201
+175%
789
Xeon E7520
286
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201
+8%
2087
Xeon E7520
1924
General Parameters
Feb 2018
Release Date
Mar 2010
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Zen
Core Architecture
Nehalem-EX
AMD BGA SP4r2
Socket
Intel Socket 1567
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC Embedded (Zen (Snowy Owl))
Generation
Xeon(Beckton)
Package
4.8 billions
Transistor Count
2.3 billions
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
45 nm
30 W
Power Consumption
95 W
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
Intel
213 mm²
Die Size
684 mm²
CPU Performance
1.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.866 GHz
3.1 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
8
Total Core Count
4
8
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
133 MHz
15.0
Multiplier
14.0
96 K per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
256 KB per core
16 MB shared
L3 Cache
18 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
8
Memory Parameters
DDR4-2133
Memory Types
DDR3-1333
2
Max Memory Channels
4
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
3
PCIe Version
2
32
PCIe Lanes
-
