Home Comparison AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 vs Opteron X2150

AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 vs Opteron X2150

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 with 96 cores 2.4GHz and Opteron X2150 with 4 cores 1.9GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (2.4GHz vs 1.9GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 28nm)
Opteron X2150 's Advantages
Lower TDP (22W vs 360W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 +1046%
1984
Opteron X2150
173
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 +3585%
19940
Opteron X2150
541
VS

General Parameters

Mar 2023
Release Date
May 2013
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Genoa
Core Architecture
Kyoto
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
AMD Socket FT3
N/A
Integrated Graphics
HD 8400
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))
Generation
Opteron (X-Series)

Package

78.84 billions
Transistor Count
-
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
28 nm
360 W
Power Consumption
22 W
TSMC
Foundry
-
12x72 mm²
Die Size
-
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-

CPU Performance

2.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
96
Total Core Count
4
192
Total Thread Count
4
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
24.0
Multiplier
19.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
2 MB shared
384 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR3
12
Max Memory Channels
Yes
ECC Memory Support
No

Miscellaneous

5
PCIe Version
-
128
PCIe Lanes
-

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy