AMD Ryzen 5 1600 vs Intel Core i5 13400F

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

Intel Core i5 13400F

We compared two desktop CPUs: AMD Ryzen 5 1600 with 6 cores 3.2GHz and Intel Core i5 13400F with 10 cores 2.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD Ryzen 5 1600 's Advantages

Higher base frequency (3.2GHz vs 2.5GHz)

Intel Core i5 13400F 's Advantages

Released 5 years and 9 months late

Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 2666)

Larger memory bandwidth (76.8GB/s vs 39.74GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 3.0)

Larger L3 cache size (20MB vs 16MB)

More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 14nm)

Score

Benchmark

Cinebench R23 Single Core

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

898

Intel Core i5 13400F +100%

1796

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

6168

Intel Core i5 13400F +132%

14311

Geekbench 6 Single Core

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

1144

Intel Core i5 13400F +72%

1973

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

5129

Intel Core i5 13400F +72%

8833

Blender

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

115

Intel Core i5 13400F +78%

205

Geekbench 5 Single Core

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

924

Intel Core i5 13400F +93%

1790

Geekbench 5 Multi Core

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

5065

Intel Core i5 13400F +138%

12086

Passmark CPU Single Core

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

2060

Intel Core i5 13400F +81%

3738

Passmark CPU Multi Core

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

12279

Intel Core i5 13400F +109%

25725

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

VS

Intel Core i5 13400F

General Parameters

Apr 2017

Release Date

Jan 2023

AMD

Manufacturer

Intel

Desktop

Type

Desktop

x86-64

Instruction Set

x86-64

Zen

Core Architecture

Raptor Lake

-

Processor Number

i5-13400F

AM4

Socket

LGA-1700

N/A

Integrated Graphics

N/A

Package

4.8 billions

Transistor Count

-

14 nm

Manufacturing Process

10 nm

65 W

Power Consumption

65 W

-

Max Turbo Power Consumption

148 W

95 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

100°C

CPU Performance

6

Performance Cores

6

12

Performance Core Threads

12

3.2 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

2.5 GHz

3.6 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

4.6 GHz

-

Efficiency Cores

4

-

Efficiency Core Threads

4

-

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

1.8 GHz

-

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

3.3 GHz

6

Total Core Count

10

12

Total Thread Count

16

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

32x

Multiplier

25x

96 K per core

L1 Cache

80 K per core

512 K per core

L2 Cache

9.5 MB

16 MB shared

L3 Cache

20 MB shared

Yes

Unlocked Multiplier

No

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2666

Memory Types

DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200

64 GB

Max Memory Size

192 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

39.74 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

76.8 GB/s

Yes

ECC Memory Support

-

Miscellaneous

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

Official Website

Intel Core i5 13400F

3.0

PCIe Version

5.0

20

PCIe Lanes

20

Related CPU Comparisons

1

AMD Ryzen 5 1600 vs Intel Core i5 9600

2

AMD Ryzen 5 1600 vs Intel Core i9 11900

3

AMD Ryzen 5 1600 vs Intel Core i7 14701TE

4

AMD Ryzen 5 1600 vs AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D

5

AMD Ryzen 5 1600 vs Intel Core i7 13700F

6

AMD Ryzen 5 1600 vs AMD Ryzen 7 5800

7

AMD Ryzen 5 1600 vs Intel Core i5 6600K

8

AMD Ryzen 5 1600 vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600X

9

AMD Ryzen 5 1600 vs AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 4350GE

10

AMD Ryzen 5 1600 vs Intel Core i5 12490F

Related News

1

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

2

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

3

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

4

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

5

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

6

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

7

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

8

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

9

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early

10

Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster