AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs AMD Ryzen 5 8600G

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

AMD Ryzen 5 8600G

We compared two desktop CPUs: AMD Ryzen 5 2600 with 6 cores 3.4GHz and AMD Ryzen 5 8600G with 6 cores 4.3GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD Ryzen 5 8600G 's Advantages

Released 5 years and 4 months late

Integrated graphics card

Higher specification of memory (5200 vs 2933)

Larger memory bandwidth (83.2GB/s vs 43.71GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (4.0 vs 3.0)

Higher base frequency (4.3GHz vs 3.4GHz)

More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 12nm)

Score

Benchmark

Cinebench R23 Single Core

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

1016

AMD Ryzen 5 8600G +71%

1738

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

7101

AMD Ryzen 5 8600G +88%

13359

Geekbench 6 Single Core

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

1170

AMD Ryzen 5 8600G +132%

2725

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

4526

AMD Ryzen 5 8600G +175%

12453

Blender

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

129

AMD Ryzen 5 8600G +72%

223

Passmark CPU Single Core

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

2242

AMD Ryzen 5 8600G +72%

3864

Passmark CPU Multi Core

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

13124

AMD Ryzen 5 8600G +92%

25316

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 8600G

General Parameters

Sep 2018

Release Date

Jan 2024

AMD

Manufacturer

AMD

Desktop

Type

Desktop

x86-64

Instruction Set

x86-64

Zen+

Core Architecture

Zen 4 (Phoenix)

AM4

Socket

AM5

N/A

Integrated Graphics

Radeon 760M

-

Generation

Ryzen 5 (Zen 4 (Phoenix))

Package

4.8 billions

Transistor Count

25 billions

12 nm

Manufacturing Process

4 nm

65 W

Power Consumption

45-65 W

95 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

95°C

-

Foundry

TSMC

-

Die Size

178 mm²

CPU Performance

6

Performance Cores

6

12

Performance Core Threads

12

3.4 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

4.3 GHz

3.9 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

5 GHz

6

Total Core Count

6

12

Total Thread Count

12

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

34x

Multiplier

43x

96 K per core

L1 Cache

64 K per core

512 K per core

L2 Cache

6 MB

16 MB shared

L3 Cache

16 MB

Yes

Unlocked Multiplier

Yes

-

SMP

1

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2933

Memory Types

DDR5-5200

64 GB

Max Memory Size

256 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

43.71 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

83.2 GB/s

Yes

ECC Memory Support

Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

-

Integrated Graphics

true

-

GPU Base Frequency

800 MHz

-

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

2800 MHz

-

Shader Units

512

-

Texture Units

32

-

Raster Operation Units

16

-

Execution Units

8

-

Power Consumption

15

-

Graphics Performance

2.87 TFLOPS

AI Accelerator

-

NPU

AMD Ryzen™ AI

-

Theoretical performance

16 TOPS

Miscellaneous

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

Official Website

AMD Ryzen 5 8600G

3.0

PCIe Version

4.0

20

PCIe Lanes

20

Related CPU Comparisons

1

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i3 14100

2

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i7 7820X

3

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs AMD Ryzen 5 1600

4

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i5 11400

5

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Pentium 350

6

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i7 12700E

7

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i7 12700T

8

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

9

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i5 9400

10

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i3 10300

Related News

1

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

2

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

3

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

4

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

5

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

6

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

7

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

8

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

9

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early

10

Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster