AMD Ryzen 5 3400G vs Intel Core i7 14790F

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

Intel Core i7 14790F

We compared two desktop CPUs: AMD Ryzen 5 3400G with 4 cores 3.7GHz and Intel Core i7 14790F with 16 cores 2.1GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G 's Advantages

Integrated graphics card

Higher base frequency (3.7GHz vs 2.1GHz)

Intel Core i7 14790F 's Advantages

Released 4 years and 6 months late

Higher specification of memory (5600 vs 2933)

Larger memory bandwidth (89.6GB/s vs 43.71GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 3.0)

Larger L3 cache size (36MB vs 4MB)

More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 12nm)

Score

Benchmark

Cinebench R23 Single Core

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

1060

Intel Core i7 14790F +99%

2112

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

4776

Intel Core i7 14790F +518%

29535

Geekbench 6 Single Core

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

1170

Intel Core i7 14790F +143%

2848

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

3331

Intel Core i7 14790F +464%

18799

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

VS

Intel Core i7 14790F

General Parameters

Jul 2019

Release Date

Jan 2024

AMD

Manufacturer

Intel

Desktop

Type

Desktop

x86-64

Instruction Set

x86-64

Picasso

Core Architecture

Raptor Lake Refresh

-

Processor Number

i7-14790F

AM4

Socket

LGA-1700

Radeon RX Vega 11

Integrated Graphics

No

Package

4.9 billions

Transistor Count

-

12 nm

Manufacturing Process

10 nm

45-65 W

Power Consumption

65 W

-

Max Turbo Power Consumption

219 W

95 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

100°C

CPU Performance

4

Performance Cores

8

Performance Core Threads

16

3.7 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

2.1 GHz

4.2 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

5.3 GHz

-

Efficiency Cores

8

-

Efficiency Core Threads

8

-

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

1.5 GHz

-

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

4.2 GHz

4

Total Core Count

16

8

Total Thread Count

24

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

37x

Multiplier

21x

96 K per core

L1 Cache

80 K per core

512 K per core

L2 Cache

24 MB

4 MB shared

L3 Cache

36 MB

Yes

Unlocked Multiplier

No

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2933

Memory Types

DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200

64 GB

Max Memory Size

192 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

43.71 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

89.6 GB/s

Yes

ECC Memory Support

Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

-

300 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

-

1300 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

-

704

Shader Units

-

44

Texture Units

-

8

Raster Operation Units

-

11

Execution Units

-

65 W

Power Consumption

-

3840x2160 - 60 Hz

Max Resolution

-

1.746 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

-

Miscellaneous

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

Official Website

Intel Core i7 14790F

3.0

PCIe Version

5.0

8

PCIe Lanes

20

Related CPU Comparisons

1

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700E

2

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G vs AMD Threadripper PRO 7945WX

3

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G vs Intel Core i9 12900F

4

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

5

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

6

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G vs AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

7

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G vs Intel Core i3 14100F

8

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G vs Intel Core i3 8300

9

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G vs Intel Core i9 10900

10

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G vs Intel Core i9 9900

Related News

1

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

2

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

3

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

4

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

5

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

6

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

7

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

8

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

9

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early

10

Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster