AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS vs Intel Core i7 8705G

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS

Intel Core i7 8705G

We compared two laptop CPUs: AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS with 6 cores 3.0GHz and Intel Core i7 8705G with 4 cores 3.1GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS 's Advantages

Released 2 years late

Integrated graphics card

Higher specification of memory (4266 vs 2400)

Larger memory bandwidth (68.27GB/s vs 37.5GB/s)

More modern manufacturing process (7nm vs 14nm)

Intel Core i7 8705G 's Advantages

Higher base frequency (3.1GHz vs 3.0GHz)

Score

Benchmark

Cinebench R23 Single Core

AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS +3%

1151

Intel Core i7 8705G

1116

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS +82%

8931

Intel Core i7 8705G

4907

Geekbench 6 Single Core

AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS +23%

1365

Intel Core i7 8705G

1106

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS +75%

5454

Intel Core i7 8705G

3101

Geekbench 5 Single Core

AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS +6%

1085

Intel Core i7 8705G

1020

Geekbench 5 Multi Core

AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS +42%

5506

Intel Core i7 8705G

3854

Passmark CPU Single Core

AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS +8%

2441

Intel Core i7 8705G

2256

Passmark CPU Multi Core

AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS +86%

14481

Intel Core i7 8705G

7755

AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS

VS

Intel Core i7 8705G

General Parameters

Jan 2020

Release Date

Jan 2018

AMD

Manufacturer

Intel

Laptop

Type

Laptop

x86-64

Instruction Set

x86-64

Zen 2

Core Architecture

Kaby Lake G

-

Processor Number

i7-8705G

FP6

Socket

BGA-2270

Radeon RX Vega 6

Integrated Graphics

-

Package

7 nm

Manufacturing Process

14 nm

35-54 W

Power Consumption

0 W

105 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

100 °C

CPU Performance

6

Performance Cores

4

12

Performance Core Threads

8

3.0 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

3.1 GHz

4 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

4.1 GHz

6

Total Core Count

4

12

Total Thread Count

8

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

30x

Multiplier

31x

32 K per core

L1 Cache

64 K per core

512 K per core

L2 Cache

256 K per core

8 MB shared

L3 Cache

8 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-4266

Memory Types

DDR4-2400

64 GB

Max Memory Size

64 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

68.27 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

37.5 GB/s

Yes

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

-

1500 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

-

384

Shader Units

-

24

Texture Units

-

8

Raster Operation Units

-

15 W

Power Consumption

-

Miscellaneous

AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS

Official Website

Intel Core i7 8705G

3.0

PCIe Version

3.0

16

PCIe Lanes

8

-

Extended Instruction Set

SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2

Related CPU Comparisons

1

AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS vs Intel Core Ultra 7 258V

2

AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS vs Intel Pentium Silver N5030

3

AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS vs AMD Ryzen 5 7535U

4

AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS vs Intel Core i5 1135G7

5

AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS vs AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme

6

AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS vs AMD Ryzen 3 7320U

7

AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS vs Intel Core i5 9300H

8

AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P 66 100

9

AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS vs AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX

10

AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS vs Intel Core i9 13950HX

Related News

1

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

2

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

3

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

4

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

5

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

6

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

7

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

8

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

9

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early

10

Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster