AMD Ryzen 5 8400F vs Intel Core i3 9300

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F

Intel Core i3 9300

We compared two desktop CPUs: AMD Ryzen 5 8400F with 6 cores 4.2GHz and Intel Core i3 9300 with 4 cores 3.7GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F 's Advantages

Released 5 years and 1 months late

Higher specification of memory (5200 vs 2400)

Larger memory bandwidth (83.2GB/s vs 37.5GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (4.0 vs 3.0)

Higher base frequency (4.2GHz vs 3.7GHz)

Larger L3 cache size (16MB vs 8MB)

More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 14nm)

Intel Core i3 9300 's Advantages

Integrated graphics card

Lower TDP (62W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F +129%

2500

Intel Core i3 9300

1090

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F +390%

10760

Intel Core i3 9300

2195

Passmark CPU Single Core

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F +33%

3553

Intel Core i3 9300

2660

Passmark CPU Multi Core

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F +218%

23127

Intel Core i3 9300

7256

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F

VS

Intel Core i3 9300

General Parameters

May 2024

Release Date

Apr 2019

Amd

Manufacturer

Intel

Desktop

Type

Desktop

x86-64

Instruction Set

x86-64

Zen 4 (Phoenix)

Core Architecture

Coffee Lake

-

Processor Number

i3-9300

AM5

Socket

LGA-1151

No

Integrated Graphics

UHD Graphics 630

Ryzen 5 (Zen 4 (Phoenix))

Generation

-

Package

25 billions

Transistor Count

-

4 nm

Manufacturing Process

14 nm

45-65 W

Power Consumption

62 W

95 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

100 °C

TSMC

Foundry

-

178 mm²

Die Size

-

CPU Performance

6

Performance Cores

4

12

Performance Core Threads

4

4.2 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

3.7 GHz

4.7 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

4.3 GHz

6

Total Core Count

4

12

Total Thread Count

4

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

42

Multiplier

37x

64 K per core

L1 Cache

64 K per core

1 MB per core

L2 Cache

256 K per core

16 MB shared

L3 Cache

8 MB shared

Yes

Unlocked Multiplier

No

1

SMP

-

Memory Parameters

DDR5-5200

Memory Types

DDR4-2400

256 GB

Max Memory Size

64 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

83.2 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

37.5 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

-

Integrated Graphics

true

-

GPU Base Frequency

350 MHz

-

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

1150 MHz

-

Shader Units

192

-

Texture Units

24

-

Raster Operation Units

3

-

Execution Units

24

-

Power Consumption

15 W

-

Max Resolution

4096x2304 - 60 Hz

-

Graphics Performance

0.38 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F

Official Website

Intel Core i3 9300

4.0

PCIe Version

3.0

20

PCIe Lanes

16

-

Extended Instruction Set

SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2

Related CPU Comparisons

1

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

2

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F vs Intel Core i7 12700T

3

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F vs Intel Core Ultra 5 240

4

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F vs Intel Core i7 9800X

5

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F vs Intel Core i7 13700T

6

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600

7

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F vs Intel Core i5 11600KF

8

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F vs Intel Core i7 7700K

9

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F vs Intel Core i5 10600K

10

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F vs Intel Core 5 130HL

Related News

1

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

2

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

3

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

4

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

5

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

6

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

7

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

8

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

9

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early

10

Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster