AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P 64 100

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus (X1P-64-100)

We compared two laptop CPUs: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U with 6 cores 3.5GHz and Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P 64 100 with 10 cores 3.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U 's Advantages

Higher base frequency (3.5GHz vs 3.4GHz)

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P 64 100 's Advantages

Integrated graphics card

Higher specification of memory (8448 vs 5600)

Newer PCIe version (4.0 vs 4)

Larger L3 cache size (42MB vs 16MB)

Lower TDP (23W vs 28W)

Score

Benchmark

Cinebench R23 Single Core

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U +5%

1552

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P 64 100

1469

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U

10675

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P 64 100 +10%

11764

Geekbench 6 Single Core

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U +7%

2519

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P 64 100

2347

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U

10308

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P 64 100 +25%

12970

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U

VS

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P 64 100

General Parameters

Apr 2024

Release Date

Apr 2024

AMD

Manufacturer

Qualcomm

Laptop

Type

Laptop

-

Instruction Set

ARMv9

Hawk Point

Core Architecture

Snapdragon X

-

Processor Number

X1P-64-100

AMD Socket FP7

Socket

Custom

Radeon 760M

Integrated Graphics

Qualcomm Adreno X1

Ryzen 5 (Zen 4 (Hawk Point))

Generation

-

Package

25 billions

Transistor Count

-

4 nm

Manufacturing Process

4 nm

28 W

Power Consumption

23 W

TSMC

Foundry

-

178 mm²

Die Size

-

CPU Performance

-

Performance Cores

10

-

Performance Core Threads

10

3.5 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

3.4 GHz

4.9 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

-

6

Total Core Count

10

12

Total Thread Count

10

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

-

35.0

Multiplier

34x

64 KB per core

L1 Cache

-

1 MB per core

L2 Cache

-

16 MB shared

L3 Cache

42 MB

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

1

SMP

-

Memory Parameters

DDR5-5600

Memory Types

LPDDR5X-8448

-

Max Memory Size

64 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

8

-

Max Memory Bandwidth

135 GB/s

Yes

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

-

Integrated Graphics

true

-

GPU Base Frequency

500 MHz

-

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

1200 MHz

-

Shader Units

1536

-

Texture Units

48

-

Raster Operation Units

6

-

Execution Units

6

-

Graphics Performance

3.8 TFLOPS

AI Accelerator

-

NPU

Qualcomm Hexagon NPU

-

Theoretical performance

45 TOPS

Miscellaneous

-

Official Website

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P 64 100

4

PCIe Version

4.0

20

PCIe Lanes

-

Related CPU Comparisons

1

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P 64 100

2

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U vs Intel Pentium N3700

3

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U vs Apple M4 8 Cores

4

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U vs Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

5

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U vs Intel Core i7 8705G

6

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U vs Intel Core i3 7100U

7

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U vs Intel Core i7 11390H

8

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U vs Intel Core i7 12650H

9

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U vs AMD Ryzen 3 3200U

10

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U vs Intel Core i7 12800H

Related News

1

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

2

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

3

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

4

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

5

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

6

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

7

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

8

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

9

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early

10

Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster