AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Intel Core i5 14600

VS

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

Intel Core i5 14600

We compared two desktop CPUs: AMD Ryzen 7 2700X with 8 cores 3.7GHz and Intel Core i5 14600 with 14 cores 2.7GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 's Advantages

Higher base frequency (3.7GHz vs 2.7GHz)

Intel Core i5 14600 's Advantages

Released 5 years and 9 months late

Integrated graphics card

Higher specification of memory (5600 vs 2933)

Larger memory bandwidth (89.6GB/s vs 43.71GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 3.0)

Larger L3 cache size (24MB vs 16MB)

More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 12nm)

Lower TDP (65W vs 105W)

Score

Benchmark

Cinebench R23 Single Core

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

1102

Intel Core i5 14600 +77%

1953

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

10106

Intel Core i5 14600 +136%

23945

Geekbench 6 Single Core

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

1151

Intel Core i5 14600 +141%

2783

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

5763

Intel Core i5 14600 +179%

16103

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

VS

Intel Core i5 14600

General Parameters

Apr 2018

Release Date

Jan 2024

AMD

Manufacturer

Intel

Desktop

Type

Desktop

x86-64

Instruction Set

x86-64

Zen+

Core Architecture

Raptor Lake Refresh

-

Processor Number

i5-14600

AM4

Socket

LGA-1700

N/A

Integrated Graphics

UHD Graphics 770

Package

4.8 billions

Transistor Count

-

12 nm

Manufacturing Process

10 nm

105 W

Power Consumption

65 W

-

Max Turbo Power Consumption

154 W

85 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

100°C

CPU Performance

8

Performance Cores

6

16

Performance Core Threads

12

3.7 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

2.7 GHz

4.3 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

5.2 GHz

-

Efficiency Cores

8

-

Efficiency Core Threads

8

-

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

2.0 GHz

-

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

3.9 GHz

8

Total Core Count

14

16

Total Thread Count

20

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

37x

Multiplier

27x

96 K per core

L1 Cache

80 K per core

512 K per core

L2 Cache

2 MB per core

16 MB shared

L3 Cache

24 MB shared

Yes

Unlocked Multiplier

No

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2933

Memory Types

DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200

64 GB

Max Memory Size

192 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

43.71 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

89.6 GB/s

Yes

ECC Memory Support

Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

-

Integrated Graphics

true

-

GPU Base Frequency

300 MHz

-

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

1550 MHz

-

Shader Units

256

-

Texture Units

16

-

Raster Operation Units

8

-

Execution Units

32

-

Power Consumption

15 W

-

Graphics Performance

0.78 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

Official Website

Intel Core i5 14600

3.0

PCIe Version

5.0

20

PCIe Lanes

20

Related CPU Comparisons

1

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Intel Core i5 11400

2

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Intel Core i9 12900KS

3

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Intel Processor 300

4

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Intel Core i5 6600K

5

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Intel Core i9 13900KF

6

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Intel Core Ultra 7 155HL

7

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Intel Core i3 10100F

8

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Intel Core i3 8300

9

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Intel Core i9 14901E

10

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Intel Core i5 13600

Related News

1

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

2

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

3

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

4

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

5

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

6

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

7

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

8

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

9

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early

10

Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster