AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX vs Intel Core i5 8365U

VS

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX

Intel Core i5 8365U

We compared two laptop CPUs: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX with 16 cores 2.4GHz and Intel Core i5 8365U with 4 cores 1.6GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX 's Advantages

Released 4 years and 9 months late

Better graphics card performance

Higher specification of memory (5200 vs 2400)

Larger memory bandwidth (83.2GB/s vs 37.5GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 3.0)

Higher base frequency (2.4GHz vs 1.6GHz)

Larger L3 cache size (64MB vs 6MB)

More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 14nm)

Intel Core i5 8365U 's Advantages

Lower TDP (15W vs 55W)

Score

Benchmark

Cinebench R23 Single Core

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX +60%

1864

Intel Core i5 8365U

1158

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX +814%

33370

Intel Core i5 8365U

3650

Geekbench 6 Single Core

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX +91%

2688

Intel Core i5 8365U

1401

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX +277%

15655

Intel Core i5 8365U

4142

Blender

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX +1005%

575

Intel Core i5 8365U

52

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX

VS

Intel Core i5 8365U

General Parameters

Jan 2024

Release Date

Apr 2019

AMD

Manufacturer

Intel

Laptop

Type

Laptop

x86-64

Instruction Set

x86-64

Zen 4 (Dragon Range)

Core Architecture

Whiskey Lake

-

Processor Number

i5-8365U

AMD Socket FL1

Socket

BGA-1528

Radeon 610M

Integrated Graphics

UHD Graphics 620

Package

13.14 billions

Transistor Count

-

5 nm

Manufacturing Process

14 nm

55 W

Power Consumption

15 W

100°C

Peak Operating Temperature

100 °C

CPU Performance

16

Performance Cores

4

32

Performance Core Threads

8

2.4 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

1.6 GHz

5.2 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

4.1 GHz

16

Total Core Count

4

32

Total Thread Count

8

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

24

Multiplier

16x

64 K per core

L1 Cache

32 K per core

1 MB per core

L2 Cache

256 K per core

64 MB

L3 Cache

6 MB shared

Yes

Unlocked Multiplier

No

Memory Parameters

DDR5-5200

Memory Types

DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133

64 GB

Max Memory Size

64 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

83.2 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

37.5 GB/s

-

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

true

400 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

300 MHz

2200 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

1100 MHz

128

Shader Units

192

8

Texture Units

24

4

Raster Operation Units

3

2

Execution Units

24

15 W

Power Consumption

15 W

-

Max Resolution

4096x2304 - 60 Hz

0.563 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

0.38 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Official Website

Intel Core i5 8365U

5.0

PCIe Version

3.0

28

PCIe Lanes

16

-

Extended Instruction Set

SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2

Related CPU Comparisons

1

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX vs Intel Core i5 10200H

2

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX vs AMD Ryzen 5 6600U

3

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX vs Apple M2

4

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX vs Intel Core i7 1355U

5

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX vs Intel Core i9 12900HK

6

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX vs Intel Core i9 13950HX

7

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX vs Intel Core i5 1038NG7

8

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX vs Intel Core i7 11390H

9

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX vs AMD Ryzen AI Max 385

10

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX vs Intel Core i7 8705G

Related News

1

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

2

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

3

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

4

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

5

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

6

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

7

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

8

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

9

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early

10

Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster