Home Comparison AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 vs Intel Core 9 270H

AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 vs Intel Core 9 270H

AMD Ryzen AI Max 385
VS
Intel Core 9 270H
AMD Ryzen AI Max 385
Intel Core 9 270H
We compared two laptop CPUs: AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 with 8 cores 2GHz and Intel Core 9 270H with 14 cores 2.7GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 's Advantages
Integrated graphics card
Higher specification of memory (8000 vs 5200)
Larger memory bandwidth (128GB/s vs 83.2GB/s)
Larger L3 cache size (64MB vs 24MB)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 10nm)
Intel Core 9 270H 's Advantages
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (2.7GHz vs 2GHz)
Lower TDP (45W vs 54W)

Score

AMD Ryzen AI Max 385
VS
Intel Core 9 270H

General Parameters

Jan 2025
Release Date
Dec 2024
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Laptop
Type
Laptop
x86-64
Instruction Set
-
Strix Halo
Core Architecture
Raptor Lake-H
AMD Socket FP8
Socket
Intel BGA 1744
32CU(Unknown)
Integrated Graphics
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
Ryzen AI Max (Zen 5 (Strix Halo))
Generation
Core 9(Raptor Lake-H Refresh)

Package

Transistor Count
-
4 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
15-54 W
Power Consumption
45 W
W
Max Turbo Power Consumption
-
100°C
Peak Operating Temperature
100°C
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-

CPU Performance

8
Performance Cores
6
16
Performance Core Threads
12
2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
5.1 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
0
Efficiency Cores
8
Efficiency Core Threads
8
0 MHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
2000 MHz
0 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
8
Total Core Count
14
16
Total Thread Count
20
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
20.0
Multiplier
27.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
80 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
2 MB per core
64 MB
L3 Cache
24 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

LPDDR5X-8000
Memory Types
DDR4-3200, DDR5-5200
96 GB
Max Memory Size
-
2
Max Memory Channels
2
128 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
83.2 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
No

Graphics Card Parameters

true
Integrated Graphics
-
GPU Base Frequency
-
MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
-
Shader Units
-
Texture Units
-
Raster Operation Units
-
32
Execution Units
-
Power Consumption
-
Max Resolution
-
0 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
-

AI Accelerator

AMD Ryzen™ AI
NPU
-
55 TOPS
Theoretical performance
-

Miscellaneous

AMD Ryzen AI Max 385
Official Website
Intel Core 9 270H
4
PCIe Version
5
16
PCIe Lanes
8

Related CPU Comparisons

1
AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 vs AMD Ryzen 9 4900H
2
AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 vs Intel Core i9 11900H
3
AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 vs Intel Core i5 14450HX
4
AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U
5
AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 vs Intel Core i3 1110G4
6
AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 vs Intel Celeron 6305
7
AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 vs AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS
8
AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 vs AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
9
AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 vs Intel Core i7 8559U
10
AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 vs Intel Core i9 12950HX

Related News

1
Strix Halo Integrated Graphics Score Appears on Passmark, Currently Slightly Below RTX 3060 12GB
2
AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT
3
Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card
4
CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory
5
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
6
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
7
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
8
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
9
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
10
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy