Home Comparison AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U vs AMD EPYC 75F3

AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U vs AMD EPYC 75F3

We compared two server CPUs: AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U with 6 cores 3.5GHz and AMD EPYC 75F3 with 32 cores 2.95GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Higher specification of memory (DDR5-5600 vs DDR4-3200)
Higher base frequency (3.5GHz vs 2.95GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 7nm)
Lower TDP (28W vs 280W)
AMD EPYC 75F3 's Advantages
Larger L3 cache size (256MB vs 16MB)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U +42%
2519
AMD EPYC 75F3
1762
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U
10308
AMD EPYC 75F3 +57%
16249
VS

General Parameters

Apr 2024
Release Date
Mar 2021
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Hawk Point
Core Architecture
Milan
AMD Socket FP8
Socket
AMD Socket SP3
Radeon 760M
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Ryzen Embedded (Zen 4 (Hawk Point))
Generation
EPYC (Zen 3 (Milan))

Package

25 billions
Transistor Count
33.2 billions
4 nm
Manufacturing Process
7 nm
AMD Socket FP8
Socket
AMD Socket SP3
28 W
Power Consumption
280 W
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
178 mm²
Die Size
8x81 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
12 nm
-
I/O Die Size
416 mm²
FP8, FP7, FP7r2
Package
FCLGA-4094

CPU Performance

3.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.95 GHz
4.9 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
6
Total Core Count
32
12
Total Thread Count
64
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
35.0
Multiplier
29.5
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
512 KB per core
16 MB shared
L3 Cache
256 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
-
Cores per CCD
4
1
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR5-5600
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
2
Max Memory Channels
8
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

4
PCIe Version
4
20
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy