Home Comparison AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX vs Intel Core i7 10700K

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX vs Intel Core i7 10700K

We compared two desktop CPUs: AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX with 32 cores 3.5GHz and Intel Core i7 10700K with 8 cores 3.8GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX 's Advantages
Higher specification of memory (3200 vs 2933)
Larger memory bandwidth (204.8GB/s vs 45.8GB/s)
Newer PCIe version (4.0 vs 3.0)
Larger L3 cache size (128MB vs 16MB)
More modern manufacturing process (7nm vs 14nm)
Intel Core i7 10700K 's Advantages
Integrated graphics card
Higher base frequency (3.8GHz vs 3.5GHz)
Lower TDP (125W vs 280W)

Score

Benchmark

Cinebench R23 Single Core
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX
1244
Intel Core i7 10700K +6%
1324
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX +234%
43450
Intel Core i7 10700K
12983
Geekbench 6 Single Core
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX
1615
Intel Core i7 10700K
1601
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX +127%
17022
Intel Core i7 10700K
7472
Blender
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX +205%
653
Intel Core i7 10700K
214
Geekbench 5 Single Core
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX
1277
Intel Core i7 10700K +7%
1378
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX +207%
26498
Intel Core i7 10700K
8629
Passmark CPU Single Core
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX
2661
Intel Core i7 10700K +14%
3060
Passmark CPU Multi Core
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX +228%
62727
Intel Core i7 10700K
19100
VS

General Parameters

Jul 2020
Release Date
May 2020
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
x86-64
Zen 2
Core Architecture
Comet Lake-S
-
Processor Number
i7-10700K
sWRX8
Socket
LGA-1200
N/A
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 630

Package

7 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
280 W
Power Consumption
125 W
90 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
100 °C

CPU Performance

32
Performance Cores
8
64
Performance Core Threads
16
3.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
4.2 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
32
Total Core Count
8
64
Total Thread Count
16
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
35x
Multiplier
38x
96 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
256 K per core
128 MB shared
L3 Cache
16 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR4-2933
2048 GB
Max Memory Size
128 GB
8
Max Memory Channels
2
204.8 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
45.8 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
No

Graphics Card Parameters

-
Integrated Graphics
true
-
GPU Base Frequency
350 MHz
-
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1200 MHz
-
Shader Units
192
-
Texture Units
24
-
Raster Operation Units
3
-
Execution Units
24
-
Power Consumption
15 W
-
Max Resolution
4096x2304 - 60 Hz
-
Graphics Performance
0.38 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

4.0
PCIe Version
3.0
128
PCIe Lanes
16

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy