AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3995WX vs Intel Celeron G4900

VS

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3995WX

Intel Celeron G4900

We compared two desktop CPUs: AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3995WX with 64 cores 2.7GHz and Intel Celeron G4900 with 2 cores 3.1GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3995WX 's Advantages

Released 2 years and 3 months late

Higher specification of memory (3200 vs 2400)

Larger memory bandwidth (204.8GB/s vs 37.5GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (4.0 vs 3.0)

Larger L3 cache size (256MB vs 2MB)

More modern manufacturing process (7nm vs 14nm)

Intel Celeron G4900 's Advantages

Integrated graphics card

Higher base frequency (3.1GHz vs 2.7GHz)

Lower TDP (54W vs 280W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3995WX +172%

1595

Intel Celeron G4900

585

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3995WX +1333%

15338

Intel Celeron G4900

1070

Geekbench 5 Single Core

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3995WX +65%

1263

Intel Celeron G4900

763

Geekbench 5 Multi Core

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3995WX +2172%

32289

Intel Celeron G4900

1421

Passmark CPU Single Core

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3995WX +37%

2596

Intel Celeron G4900

1882

Passmark CPU Multi Core

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3995WX +3289%

82252

Intel Celeron G4900

2427

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3995WX

VS

Intel Celeron G4900

General Parameters

Jul 2020

Release Date

Apr 2018

AMD

Manufacturer

Intel

Desktop

Type

Desktop

x86-64

Instruction Set

x86-64

Zen 2

Core Architecture

Coffee Lake

-

Processor Number

G4900

sWRX8

Socket

LGA-1151

N/A

Integrated Graphics

UHD Graphics 610

Package

7 nm

Manufacturing Process

14 nm

280 W

Power Consumption

54 W

90 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

100 °C

CPU Performance

64

Performance Cores

2

128

Performance Core Threads

2

2.7 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

3.1 GHz

4.2 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

-

64

Total Core Count

2

128

Total Thread Count

2

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

27x

Multiplier

31x

96 K per core

L1 Cache

64 K per core

512 K per core

L2 Cache

256 K per core

256 MB shared

L3 Cache

2 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200

Memory Types

DDR4-2400

2048 GB

Max Memory Size

64 GB

8

Max Memory Channels

2

204.8 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

37.5 GB/s

Yes

ECC Memory Support

Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

-

Integrated Graphics

true

-

GPU Base Frequency

350 MHz

-

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

1050 MHz

-

Shader Units

96

-

Texture Units

12

-

Raster Operation Units

2

-

Execution Units

12

-

Power Consumption

15 W

-

Max Resolution

4096x2304 - 30 Hz

-

Graphics Performance

0.2 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3995WX

Official Website

Intel Celeron G4900

4.0

PCIe Version

3.0

128

PCIe Lanes

16

-

Extended Instruction Set

SSE4.1, SSE4.2

Related CPU Comparisons

1

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3995WX vs AMD Ryzen 5 8600G

2

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3995WX vs Intel Core i7 9700K

3

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3995WX vs Intel Core i5 11400F

4

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3995WX vs AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT

5

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3995WX vs Intel Core i5 9600T

6

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3995WX vs AMD Ryzen 5 8400F

7

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3995WX vs Intel Core i5 12400

8

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3995WX vs Intel Core i7 6900K

9

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3995WX vs Intel Core Ultra 5 240

10

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3995WX vs Intel Pentium G4620

Related News

1

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

2

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

3

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

4

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

5

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

6

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

7

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

8

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

9

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

10

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game