Home Comparison AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX vs AMD EPYC 8024P

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX vs AMD EPYC 8024P

We compared two server CPUs: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX with 24 cores 3.8GHz and AMD EPYC 8024P with 8 cores 2.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.8GHz vs 2.4GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (128MB vs 32MB)
AMD EPYC 8024P 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 3200)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 4)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 7nm)
Lower TDP (90W vs 280W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX +101%
2086
AMD EPYC 8024P
1035
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX +179%
19489
AMD EPYC 8024P
6962
VS

General Parameters

Mar 2022
Release Date
Sep 2023
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Chagall PRO
Core Architecture
Siena
AMD Socket WRX8
Socket
AMD Socket SP6
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Ryzen Threadripper (Zen 3 (Chagall))
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4c (Siena))

Package

16.6 billions
Transistor Count
8.875 billions
7 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
280 W
Power Consumption
90 W
95 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
75 °C
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4x81 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²
14 nm
I/O Process Size
6 nm
416 mm²
I/O Die Size
397 mm²

CPU Performance

3.8 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
4.5 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
24
Total Core Count
8
48
Total Thread Count
16
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
38.0
Multiplier
24.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
128 MB
L3 Cache
32 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
8
Max Memory Channels
6
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

4
PCIe Version
5
128
PCIe Lanes
96

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy