Apple M2 Pro vs Intel Core i3 10110Y

VS

Apple M2 Pro

Intel Core i3 10110Y

We compared two laptop CPUs: Apple M2 Pro with 12 cores 3.5GHz and Intel Core i3 10110Y with 2 cores 1.0GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Apple M2 Pro 's Advantages

Released 3 years and 5 months late

Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 2133)

Larger memory bandwidth (204.8GB/s vs 33.33GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (4.0 vs 3.0)

Higher base frequency (3.5GHz vs 1.0GHz)

More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 14nm)

Intel Core i3 10110Y 's Advantages

Lower TDP (7W vs 30W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Apple M2 Pro +532%

2650

Intel Core i3 10110Y

419

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Apple M2 Pro +1040%

14275

Intel Core i3 10110Y

1252

Geekbench 5 Single Core

Apple M2 Pro +149%

1986

Intel Core i3 10110Y

797

Geekbench 5 Multi Core

Apple M2 Pro +1027%

14863

Intel Core i3 10110Y

1318

Passmark CPU Single Core

Apple M2 Pro +98%

4116

Intel Core i3 10110Y

2074

Passmark CPU Multi Core

Apple M2 Pro +707%

26265

Intel Core i3 10110Y

3252

Apple M2 Pro

VS

Intel Core i3 10110Y

General Parameters

Jan 2023

Release Date

Aug 2019

Apple

Manufacturer

Intel

Laptop

Type

Laptop

ARMv8

Instruction Set

x86-64

Apple M2

Core Architecture

Amber Lake-Y

-

Processor Number

i3-10110Y

Apple M-Socket

Socket

BGA-1377

Apple M2 Pro GPU (19-core)

Integrated Graphics

UHD Graphics

Package

40 billions

Transistor Count

-

5 nm

Manufacturing Process

14 nm

30 W

Power Consumption

7 W

100°C

Peak Operating Temperature

100 °C

CPU Performance

8

Performance Cores

2

8

Performance Core Threads

4

3.5 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

1.0 GHz

-

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

4 GHz

4

Efficiency Cores

-

4

Efficiency Core Threads

-

2.4 GHz

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

-

12

Total Core Count

2

12

Total Thread Count

4

-

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

-

Multiplier

10x

192 K per core

L1 Cache

64 K per core

32 MB shared

L2 Cache

256 K per core

-

L3 Cache

4 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

Memory Parameters

LPDDR5-6400

Memory Types

LPDDR3-2133, DDR3L-1600

32 GB

Max Memory Size

16 GB

4

Max Memory Channels

2

204.8 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

33.33 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

true

450 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

-

1398 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

1000 MHz

2432

Shader Units

-

152

Texture Units

-

76

Raster Operation Units

-

304

Execution Units

-

35 W

Power Consumption

-

7680x4320 - 60 Hz

Max Resolution

-

6.8 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

-

Miscellaneous

-

Official Website

Intel Core i3 10110Y

4.0

PCIe Version

3.0

-

PCIe Lanes

10

-

Extended Instruction Set

SSE4.1

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Apple M2 Pro vs Intel Core i9 11900H

2

Apple M2 Pro vs Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

3

Apple M2 Pro vs Apple M2

4

Apple M2 Pro vs AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme

5

Apple M2 Pro vs Intel Core i5 1038NG7

6

Apple M2 Pro vs Intel Core i7 1280P

7

Apple M2 Pro vs Intel Core 3 100U

8

Apple M2 Pro vs AMD Ryzen 7 7435H

9

Apple M2 Pro vs AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX

10

Apple M2 Pro vs Intel Pentium Silver N6005

Related News

1

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

2

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

3

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

4

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

5

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

6

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

7

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

8

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

9

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early

10

Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster