Arc A380 vs GeForce RTX 5090
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc A380 and 32GB VRAM GeForce RTX 5090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 575W)
GeForce RTX 5090 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 17% (2407MHz vs 2050MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.79TB/s vs 186.0GB/s)
20736 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A380
4198
GeForce RTX 5090
+2396%
104800
3DMark Time Spy
Arc A380
4277
GeForce RTX 5090
+1010%
47510
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Arc A380
2017
GeForce RTX 5090
+1180%
25825
3DMark Speed Way
Arc A380
576
GeForce RTX 5090
+2438%
14621
Graphics Card
Jun 2022
Release Date
Jan 2025
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
GeForce 50
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2000 MHz
Base Clock
2017 MHz
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
2407 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR7
96bit
Memory Bus
512bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1.79TB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
170
1024
Shading Units
21760
64
TMUs
680
32
ROPs
176
128
Tensor Cores
680
8
RT Cores
170
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
96 MB
Theoretical Performance
65.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
423.6 GPixel/s
131.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1637 GTexel/s
8.397 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
104.8 TFLOPS
4.198 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
104.8 TFLOPS
1050 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.637 TFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
575W
250 W
Suggested PSU
950 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1b
3x DisplayPort 2.1b
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
GB202
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
GB202-300-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Blackwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
5 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
92.2 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
750 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
-
CUDA
12.0
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
