Home Comparison Centaur CHA vs Intel Xeon E3 1235

Centaur CHA vs Intel Xeon E3 1235

We compared two server CPUs: Centaur CHA with 8 cores 1.2GHz and Intel Xeon E3 1235 with 4 cores 3.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Centaur CHA 's Advantages
Higher specification of memory (3200 vs 3)
Larger L3 cache size (16MB vs 8MB)
More modern manufacturing process (16nm vs 32nm)
Lower TDP (70W vs 95W)
Intel Xeon E3 1235 's Advantages
Released 110 years and 3 months late
Higher base frequency (3.2GHz vs 1.2GHz)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Centaur CHA +25%
786
Intel Xeon E3 1235
626
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Centaur CHA +88%
3982
Intel Xeon E3 1235
2110
VS

General Parameters

Jan 1901
Release Date
Apr 2011
VIA
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
CHA
Core Architecture
Sandy Bridge
VIA Socket 2084
Socket
Intel Socket 1155
N/A
Integrated Graphics
Intel HD P3000
CHA (CNS)
Generation
Xeon E3 (Sandy Bridge)

Package

-
Transistor Count
1.16 billions
16 nm
Manufacturing Process
32 nm
70 W
Power Consumption
95 W
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
195 mm²
Die Size
216 mm²

CPU Performance

1.2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
8
Total Core Count
4
8
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
12.0
Multiplier
32.0
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
256 KB per core
L2 Cache
256 K per core
16 MB shared
L3 Cache
8 MB shared
Yes
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR3
4
Max Memory Channels
2
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

3
PCIe Version
3
44
PCIe Lanes
16

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy