Home Comparison Centaur CHA vs AMD EPYC 7351

Centaur CHA vs AMD EPYC 7351

We compared two server CPUs: Centaur CHA with 8 cores 1.2GHz and AMD EPYC 7351 with 16 cores 2.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Centaur CHA 's Advantages
Higher specification of memory (3200 vs 2666)
Lower TDP (70W vs 170W)
AMD EPYC 7351 's Advantages
Released 116 years and 5 months late
Higher base frequency (2.4GHz vs 1.2GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (64MB vs 16MB)
More modern manufacturing process (14nm vs 16nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Centaur CHA +23%
786
AMD EPYC 7351
639
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Centaur CHA +31%
3982
AMD EPYC 7351
3035
VS

General Parameters

Jan 1901
Release Date
Jun 2017
VIA
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
CHA
Core Architecture
Naples
VIA Socket 2084
Socket
AMD Socket SP3
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
CHA (CNS)
Generation
EPYC (Zen (Naples))

Package

-
Transistor Count
4.8 billions
16 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
70 W
Power Consumption
170 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
85 °C
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
195 mm²
Die Size
213 mm²

CPU Performance

1.2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
2.9 GHz
8
Total Core Count
16
8
Total Thread Count
32
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
12.0
Multiplier
24.0
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
96 K per core
256 KB per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
16 MB shared
L3 Cache
64 MB shared
Yes
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes
2
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR4-2666
4
Max Memory Channels
8
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

3
PCIe Version
3
44
PCIe Lanes
-

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy