Home Comparison Centaur CHA vs Intel Xeon W3530

Centaur CHA vs Intel Xeon W3530

We compared two server CPUs: Centaur CHA with 8 cores 1.2GHz and Intel Xeon W3530 with 4 cores 2.8GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Centaur CHA 's Advantages
Higher specification of memory (3200 vs 3)
Newer PCIe version (3 vs 2)
Larger L3 cache size (16MB vs 8MB)
More modern manufacturing process (16nm vs 45nm)
Lower TDP (70W vs 130W)
Intel Xeon W3530 's Advantages
Released 109 years and 2 months late
Higher base frequency (2.8GHz vs 1.2GHz)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Centaur CHA +65%
786
Intel Xeon W3530
474
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Centaur CHA +131%
3982
Intel Xeon W3530
1722
VS

General Parameters

Jan 1901
Release Date
Mar 2010
VIA
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
CHA
Core Architecture
Bloomfield
VIA Socket 2084
Socket
Intel Socket 1366
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
CHA (CNS)
Generation
Xeon (Bloomfield)

Package

-
Transistor Count
0.731 billions
16 nm
Manufacturing Process
45 nm
70 W
Power Consumption
130 W
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
195 mm²
Die Size
263 mm²

CPU Performance

1.2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
2.5 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.066 GHz
8
Total Core Count
4
8
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
133 MHz
12.0
Multiplier
21.0
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
256 KB per core
L2 Cache
256 K per core
16 MB shared
L3 Cache
8 MB shared
Yes
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR3
4
Max Memory Channels
3
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

3
PCIe Version
2
44
PCIe Lanes
-

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy