Home Comparison Centaur CHA vs Intel Xeon w9 3495X

Centaur CHA vs Intel Xeon w9 3495X

We compared two server CPUs: Centaur CHA with 8 cores 1.2GHz and Intel Xeon w9 3495X with 56 cores 1.9GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Centaur CHA 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 350W)
Intel Xeon w9 3495X 's Advantages
Released 122 years and 1 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 3200)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (1.9GHz vs 1.2GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (105MB vs 16MB)
More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 16nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Centaur CHA
786
Intel Xeon w9 3495X +203%
2384
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Centaur CHA
3982
Intel Xeon w9 3495X +376%
18958
VS

General Parameters

Jan 1901
Release Date
Feb 2023
VIA
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
CHA
Core Architecture
Sapphire Rapids
VIA Socket 2084
Socket
Intel Socket 4677
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
CHA (CNS)
Generation
Xeon W (Sapphire Rapids)

Package

16 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
70 W
Power Consumption
350 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
81 °C
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
195 mm²
Die Size
4x477 mm²

CPU Performance

1.2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.9 GHz
2.5 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
8
Total Core Count
56
8
Total Thread Count
112
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
12.0
Multiplier
19.0
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
80 K per core
256 KB per core
L2 Cache
2 MB per core
16 MB shared
L3 Cache
105 MB
Yes
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes
2
SMP
1
-
AVX-512 FMA Ports
2

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
-
Max Memory Size
4 TB
4
Max Memory Channels
8
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

3
PCIe Version
5
44
PCIe Lanes
112

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy