Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs Quadro K5000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
Quadro K5000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (122W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+674%
16790
Quadro K5000
2169
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Aug 2012
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s
Render Config
4096
Shading Units
1536
256
TMUs
128
128
ROPs
32
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.59 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
90.37 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.169 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
90.37 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
122W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GK104
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
