Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs Quadro 2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and 2GB VRAM Quadro 2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 12 years late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
16192 additional rendering cores
Quadro 2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 2400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+12324%
52430
Quadro 2000M
422
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Jan 2011
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1565 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
3205GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
4
16384
Shading Units
192
1024
TMUs
32
0
ROPs
16
1024
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
408 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
2400W
TDP
55W
2800 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
N12P-Q3
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Fermi
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
100 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
