Home Comparison EPYC Embedded 8C24P vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

EPYC Embedded 8C24P vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

We compared two server CPUs: EPYC Embedded 8C24P with 12 cores 2.45GHz and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX with 64 cores 3.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

EPYC Embedded 8C24P 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 350W)
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 4800)
Higher base frequency (3.2GHz vs 2.45GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (256MB vs 32MB)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 5nm)

Score

General Parameters

Sep 2023
Release Date
Jul 2025
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Siena
Core Architecture
Shimada Peak
AMD Socket SP6
Socket
AMD Socket sTR5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC(Zen 4c (Siena))
Generation
Ryzen Threadripper (Zen 5 (Shimada Peak))

Package

17.75 billions
Transistor Count
66.52 billions
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
4 nm
100 W
Power Consumption
350 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
95°C
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
2x73 mm²
Die Size
8x70.6 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
6 nm
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
388 mm²

CPU Performance

2.45 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
3 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
12
Total Core Count
64
24
Total Thread Count
128
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
24.5
Multiplier
32.0
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
32 MB shared
L3 Cache
256 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes
1
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR5-6400
-
Max Memory Size
2 TB
6
Max Memory Channels
8
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

5
PCIe Version
5
96
PCIe Lanes
128
© 2025 - TopCPU.net