Home Comparison FireGL V8650 vs TITAN X Pascal

FireGL V8650 vs TITAN X Pascal

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
3264 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
440
TITAN X Pascal +2393%
10970

Graphics Card

Aug 2007
Release Date
Aug 2016
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1417 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1251 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR5X
512bit
Memory Bus
384bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
480.4GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
28
320
Shading Units
3584
16
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
96
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
147.0 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
342.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
171.5 GFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.97 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
342.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
GP102
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
GP102-400-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net