FirePro S7000 vs Arc A350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S7000 and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro S7000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
Lower TDP (25W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S7000
2432
Arc A350
+26%
3072
Graphics Card
Aug 2012
Release Date
Jan 2022
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
76.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
2.432 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
152.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
25W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Pitcairn
GPU Name
DG2-128
Pitcairn XT GL
(215-0828073)
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
