FireStream 9250 vs NVS 310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 512MB VRAM NVS 310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores
NVS 310 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Lower TDP (20W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
+900%
1000
NVS 310
100
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jun 2012
FireStream
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
993 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
800
Shading Units
48
40
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
20W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GF119
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.1
Shader Model
5.1