FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 230 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
GeForce GT 230 OEM 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
More VRAM (1536GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
+316%
1000
GeForce GT 230 OEM
240
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Apr 2009
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
993 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
24.00GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
800
Shading Units
96
40
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.000 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
G92B
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
G92-159-B1
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
4.1
Shader Model
4.0