FireStream 9250 vs RTX A4000H
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 16GB VRAM RTX A4000H to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A4000H 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
5344 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (140W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
RTX A4000H
+1817%
19170
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Apr 2021
FireStream
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
735 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
48
800
Shading Units
6144
40
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
149.8 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
299.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
19.17 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.17 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
299.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
140W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GA104
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
GA104-???-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.7