FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1708MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.2GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
352 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (120W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
+293%
3935
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Aug 2016
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1506 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1708 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
2002 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
192.2GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
9
800
Shading Units
1152
40
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
48
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
81.98 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
123.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
61.49 GFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
123.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
120W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GP106
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
GP106-300-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
4.1
Shader Model
6.4