FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 12 years late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
96 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (90W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
+184%
2849
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jun 2020
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
800
Shading Units
896
40
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
90W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
TU106
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
TU106-125-KAB-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6