Home Comparison FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2

FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 v2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

FireStream 9250 's Advantages
464 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 160W)
GeForce GTX 460 v2 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.19GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
GeForce GTX 460 v2 +4%
1046

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Sep 2011
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

993 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
96.19GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
7
800
Shading Units
336
40
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB

Theoretical Performance

10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.91 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.62 GTexel/s
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1046 GFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.19 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
160W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
GF114
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
GF114-400-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net