FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
288 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 244W)
GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
More VRAM (1536GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.4GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2
+58%
1581
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jun 2011
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
192.4GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
800
Shading Units
512
40
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
48
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.70 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
49.41 GTexel/s
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.581 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
197.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
244W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GF110
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
GF110-380-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
3 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1