FireStream 9250 vs GeForce RTX 4080
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 320W)
GeForce RTX 4080 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (716.8GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
8928 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
GeForce RTX 4080
+4774%
48740
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Sep 2022
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2205 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
716.8GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
76
800
Shading Units
9728
40
TMUs
304
16
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
280.6 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
761.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
48.74 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
48.74 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
761.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
320W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
AD103
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
AD103-300-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7