FireStream 9250 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 160W)
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2535MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
3552 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104
+2106%
22060
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Apr 2024
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2310 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2535 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
34
800
Shading Units
4352
40
TMUs
136
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
136
-
RT Cores
34
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
121.7 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
344.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.06 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.06 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
344.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
160W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
AD104
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
AD104-150-K1-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
