FireStream 9250 vs Radeon Pro 5500 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5500 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Pro 5500 XT 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1757MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
736 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (125W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
Radeon Pro 5500 XT
+439%
5398
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Aug 2020
FireStream
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1187 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1757 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
24
800
Shading Units
1536
40
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.22 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
168.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.80 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.398 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
337.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
125W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Navi 14
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XL
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
6.5
