FireStream 9250 vs GeForce RTX 4050
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock2640MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (216.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
1760 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (115W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
GeForce RTX 4050
+1252%
13520
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Unknown
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2505 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2640 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
216.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
18
800
Shading Units
2560
40
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
120
-
RT Cores
18
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
84.48 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
211.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
13.52 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.52 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
211.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
115W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
AD107
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
