FireStream 9250 vs AMD Radeon Pro V420
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 32GB VRAM AMD Radeon Pro V420 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Pro V420 's Advantages
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (819.2GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
3296 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
AMD Radeon Pro V420
+1293%
13930
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Unknown
FireStream
Generation
Radeon Pro Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
800 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
819.2GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
64
800
Shading Units
4096
40
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.8 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
435.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.85 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.93 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.963 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Vega 20
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Vega 20 GLXT WS
(215-0914026)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
