FireStream 9250 vs Radeon Pro W5500
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Pro W5500 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1855MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
608 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (125W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
Radeon Pro W5500
+422%
5224
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Feb 2020
FireStream
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1744 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1855 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
22
800
Shading Units
1408
40
TMUs
88
16
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.36 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.45 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.224 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
326.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
125W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Navi 14
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XL
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
6.5
