FireStream 9250 vs Radeon R7 250 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
416 additional rendering cores
Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
+24%
1000
Radeon R7 250 OEM
806
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Oct 2013
FireStream
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
6
800
Shading Units
384
40
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
65W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Oland
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
