FireStream 9250 vs RTX 5880 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 48GB VRAM RTX 5880 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 285W)
RTX 5880 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2460MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
13280 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
RTX 5880 Ada Generation
+6827%
69270
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jan 2024
FireStream
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
975 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2460 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
110
800
Shading Units
14080
40
TMUs
440
16
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
440
-
RT Cores
110
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
72 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
433.0 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1082 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
69.27 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
69.27 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1082 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
285W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
AD102
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
AD102
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7