FireStream 9250 vs RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max Q
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 96GB VRAM RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max Q 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2288MHz
More VRAM (96GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.79TB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
23264 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max Q
+10910%
110100
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Mar 2025
FireStream
Generation
Blackwell PRO W
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1590 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2288 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
96GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR7
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
1.79TB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
188
800
Shading Units
24064
40
TMUs
752
16
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
752
-
RT Cores
188
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
439.3 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1721 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
110.1 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
110.1 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.721 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1b
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GB202
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Blackwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
92.2 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
750 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
-
CUDA
12.0
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
