FireStream 9250 vs T400 4 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 4GB VRAM T400 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
416 additional rendering cores
T400 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
T400 4 GB
+9%
1094
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
May 2021
FireStream
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
420 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
800
Shading Units
384
40
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
30W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
TU117
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
