GeForce 310M vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 310M and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce 310M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (14W vs 50W)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 10.67GB/s)
1008 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 310M
49
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+4916%
2458
Graphics Card
Jan 2010
Release Date
Apr 2020
GeForce 300M
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1035 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
667 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
10.67GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
16
16
Shading Units
1024
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
2.424 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.40 GPixel/s
4.848 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.915 TFLOPS
48.96 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
14W
TDP
50W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
TU117
N11M-GE1
GPU Variant
N18P-G62
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
