GeForce 310M vs Mobility FireGL V5725
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 310M and 256MB VRAM Mobility FireGL V5725 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce 310M 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Mobility FireGL V5725 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.60GB/s vs 10.67GB/s)
104 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 310M
49
Mobility FireGL V5725
+232%
163
Graphics Card
Jan 2010
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 300M
Generation
Mobility FireGL
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
10.67GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
3
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
120
8
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
32 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
2.424 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.720 GPixel/s
4.848 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.440 GTexel/s
48.96 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
14W
TDP
Unknown
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
M86
N11M-GE1
GPU Variant
M86-ME XT GL
(216-0683010)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
0.378 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
135 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.1
