GeForce G105M vs RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM GeForce G105M and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce G105M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (14W vs 50W)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
3056 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce G105M
34
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+36223%
12350
Graphics Card
Jul 2009
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 100M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
24
16
Shading Units
3072
8
TMUs
96
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
34.24 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
14W
TDP
50W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
AD107
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
