GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs Radeon R9 280X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 59% (1590MHz vs 1000MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 375W)
Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
2849
Radeon R9 280X2
+43%
4096
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 16
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
950 MHz
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
2048
56
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
375W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
3x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Tahiti
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL
(215-0821065)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1