GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Arc A350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (2000MHz vs 1725MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+43%
4416
Arc A350
3072
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+44%
4694
Arc A350
3239
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+39%
2072
Arc A350
1481
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 16
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
20
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
25W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
DG2-128
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
