GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Arc Pro A60
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 12GB VRAM Arc Pro A60 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 130W)
Arc Pro A60 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 19% (2050MHz vs 1725MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4416
Arc Pro A60
+90%
8397
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4694
Arc Pro A60
+57%
7385
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
2072
Arc Pro A60
+74%
3623
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Jun 2023
GeForce 16
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
20
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
2048
80
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
256
-
RT Cores
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
131.2 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
262.4 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
16.79 TFLOPS
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.397 TFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
130W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
DG2-256
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G12
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
11.5 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
269 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
